An exploration of teachers' perspectives on computational thinking in mathematics learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i4.5594Keywords:
Computational thinking, Junior secondary mathematics, Mathematics learning, Teachers perspectivesAbstract
The integration of Computational Thinking (CT) into mathematics learning has become a key demand in 21st-century education, as it plays an important role in developing logical, creative, and systematic thinking skills. However, in the context of Indonesian education, implementing CT still faces various challenges, particularly regarding teachers’ understanding and readiness to integrate it into the learning process. This study aims to explore teachers’ perspectives on CT-based mathematics learning, including their understanding, perceived relevance, readiness, and the challenges they face in its implementation at the junior high school level. This study offers a novel contribution by explicitly distinguishing between teachers’ conceptual understanding of CT and their pedagogical readiness to implement CT in mathematics learning, a gap that has been insufficiently explored in previous studies. The study employed a qualitative approach with an exploratory design. The research population consisted of junior high school mathematics teachers in Singaraja City, Indonesia. Eight teachers were selected as research participants using purposive sampling based on criteria such as teaching experience, involvement in CT-related or technology-based learning, and willingness to participate in the study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and analysis of learning documents, then analyzed inductively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the teachers’ perspectives on CT-based mathematics learning are conceptually positive but still limited in practice. CT is considered relevant and potentially effective in strengthening mathematical thinking skills; however, its implementation requires systematic support. Based on these findings, the study recommends providing continuous, practice-oriented professional development programs for teachers, developing CT-based mathematics teaching resources, and stronger policy support to facilitate the effective integration of CT into junior high school mathematics learning. The study's implications highlight the importance of strategies to strengthen teachers’ capacity.
Downloads
References
Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2019). Computational thinking education: issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105(106185). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
Apriliana, L. P., Handayani, I., & Awalludin, S. A. (2019). The effect of a problem centered learning on student’s mathematical critical thinking. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 124–133.
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, G. A., Dettori, A. F., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education: Implications for policy and practice. In Joint Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.2791/792158
Büscher, C. (2025). Differences in students’ computational thinking activities when designing an algorithm for drawing plane figures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(2), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10465-3
Chytas, C., Patricia, S., & Paul, V. B. (2024). Computational thinking in secondary mathematics education with GeoGebra : insights from an intervention in calculus lessons. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 228–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-024-00141-0
CT4EDU. (n.d.). Computational thinking for educators.
Education, D. for. (2013). National curriculum in England: Computing programmes of study. GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study
El-hamamsy, L., Zapata-cáceres, M., Barroso, E. M., Mondada, F., Zufferey, D., & Bruno, B. (2022). The competent Computational Thinking test ( cCTt ): Development and validation of an unplugged computational thinking test for upper primary school. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0(0), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/ToBeAssigned
English, L. D. (2023). Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7
Graves, J. M., Abshire, D. A., Amiri, S., & Mackelprang, J. L. (2021). Disparities in technology and broadband internet access across rurality: implications for health and education. Family and Community Health, 44(4), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000306
Grover, S., & Pea, R. D. (2018). Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come. In Computer Science Education (pp. 19–38).
Gundersen, S. W. (2025). Using serious games and digital games to improve students ’ computational thinking and programming skills in k-12 education : A systematic literature review. Review. Technologies, 13(113).
Hartawan, I. G. N. Y., Putri, L. H. A., & Mahayukti, G. A. (2024). Analysis of junior high school student’s computational thinking ability in solving mathematical problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 7(1).
Hartawan, I. G. N. Y., Suharta, I. G. P., Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Pujawan, I. G. N. (2024). Student problem solving ability in mathematics learning: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 3030–3037. https://doi.org/10.61707/sm1dtc57
Juniantari, M., Ulfa, S., Sariyasa, & Suryawan, I. P. P. (2025). The effect of mobile seamless inquiry media on conceptual mathematics learning outcomes in trigonometry. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(2), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4877
Kong, S.-C., Abelson, H., & Kwok, W.-Y. (2022). Introduction to computational thinking education in k–12. In Computational Thinking Education in K–12. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13375.003.0002
Kooloos, C., Oolbekkink-marchand, H., Kaenders, R., & Heckman, G. (2023). Developing mathematical whole-class discussions : An exploratory study of teachers ’ learning paths. Teaching and Teacher Education, 134(July), 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104257
Lee, S. W. Y., Tu, H. Y., Chen, G. L., & Lin, H. M. (2023). Exploring the multifaceted roles of mathematics learning in predicting students’ computational thinking competency. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00455-2
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). Computational thinking is more about thinking than computing. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00030-2
Liu, Z., Gearty, Z., Richard, E., Orrill, C. H., Kayumova, S., & Balasubramanian, R. (2024). Bringing computational thinking into classrooms: A systematic review on supporting teachers in integrating computational thinking into K-12 classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00510-6
Markandan, N., Osman, K., & Halim, L. (2022). Integrating computational thinking and empowering metacognitive awareness in stem education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(June), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872593
Masjudin, S., I. G. P., Lasmawan, I. W., & Fatwini. (2024). Strengthening 21st century skills through an independent curriculum in mathematics education in indonesia: Challenges, potential, and strategies. International Journal of Applied Science and Sustainable Development (IJASSD), 6(2), 92–113.
Mingjing, H., & Yidi, F. (2022). The cultivation of students ’ logical thinking in chinese primary school mathematics education. IJECA International Journal of Education & Curriculum Application, 5(2), 190–195.
Noordin, N. H. (2025). Computational thinking through scaffolded game development activities : a study with graphical programming. European Journal of Educational Research, 14(4), 1137–1149.
Nordby, S. K., Mifsud, L., & Bjerke, A. H. (2024). Computational thinking in primary mathematics classroom activities. Front. Educ, 9(1414081), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1414081
Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844
OECD. (2023). Pisa 2022 Results Learning During – and From – Disruption. In Factsheets: Vol. I. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/germany-1a2cf137/
OECD. (2024). An evolution of mathematics curriculum where it was, where it stands and where it is going. In OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0ffd89d0-en
Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Jona, K., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Bringing computational thinking into high school mathematics and science classrooms. Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS , 2, 705–712.
Pratama, I. W. R. L., Widana, I. W., & Sudiarta, I. M. (2024). Application of the discovery learning model with process differentiation to improve junior high school students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v9i4.632
Purnadewi, G. A. A., & Widana, I. W. (2023). Improving students’ science numeration capability through the implementation of the PBL model based on local wisdom. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i3.3252
Rosadi, D., Agustini, K., Dantes, G. R., & Sudatha, I. G. W. (2025). Integrasi computational thinking dalam pendidikan matematika : Tinjauan literatur sistematis (Integration of Computational Thinking in Mathematics Education: A Systematic Literature Review). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 650–664.
Şahin, H., & İlic, O. (2022). Computational thinking: early childhood teachers’ and prospective teachers’ preconceptions and self-efficacy. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 11689–11713.
Shin, N., Bowers, J., Krajcik, J., & Damelin, D. (2021). Promoting computational thinking through project-based learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00033-y
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clark, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Singapore, M. of E. (2021). Incorporating computational thinking in math classrooms in Singapore: Ideas from the CTE-STEM Conference 2021. SingTeach. https://singteach.nie.edu.sg/2021/09/01/incorporating-computational-thinking-in-math-classrooms-in-singapore-ideas-from-the-cte-stem-conference-2021
Suarsana, I. M., & Dasari, D. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in mathematics education in indonesia. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICETECH 2023). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-554-6
Suarsana, I. M., Jupri, A., Suryadi, D., Nurlaelah, E., Nyoman, I. G., & Hartawan, Y. (2025). An analysis of mathematics teaching and learning process to enhance computational thinking : The case of straight-line equations. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 17(2), 226–254. https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.commons.gc.cuny.edu/wp-content/blogs.dir/34462/files/2025/05/10.Math-Teaching-Learning-Comp-Thinkinig.pdf
Sumandya, I.W., Mukminin, A., Widana, I.W., Suryawan, I.P.P, Permana Dewi, N.W.D.P., Hendra, R., and Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob. (2025). Development of an instrument to measure students’ and teachers’ perceptions of understanding by design-based mathematics learning evaluation in inclusive schools. Discov Sustain 6, 797, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01514-0
Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 28, Issue 6). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
Tondeur, J., Howard, S., Van Zanten, M., Gorissen, P., Van der Neut, I., Uerz, D., & Kral, M. (2023). The hedicom framework: higher education teachers’ digital competencies for the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10193-5
Vessonen, T., Hellstrand, H., Kurkela, M., Aunio, P., & Laine, A. (2025). The effectiveness of mathematical word problem-solving interventions among elementary schoolers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 132(October 2024), 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102642
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Wang, D., Luo, L., Luo, J., Lin, S., & Ren, G. (2022). Developing computational thinking: Design-based learning and interdisciplinary activity design. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111033
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
Widana, I. W., Wulandari, V. A., & Sudiarta, I. M. (2024). Improving mathematics learning outcomes of the Pythagorean theorem through the Jigsaw type cooperative method. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(4), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i4.3464Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2017). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/922
Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O. L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K ‑ 12 mathematics education : a systematic review on CT ‑ based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w
Zhang, L., Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2024). Enhancing mathematical problem posing competence: a meta-analysis of intervention studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00507-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Gusti Nyoman Yudi Hartawan, I Gusti Ngurah Pujawan, Nyoman Arda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.
