AI integration in history education: Perceptions of teachers and students in Palangka Raya

Authors

  • Yudi Susanto Universitas PGRI Palangka Raya
  • Sari Marselina Universitas PGRI Palangka Raya
  • Siti Nur Halijah Universitas PGRI Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i4.5470

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, History education, Learning technology, Student perception, Teacher perception

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into history education remains underexplored in peripheral regions of Indonesia, where infrastructure limitations and concerns about cultural representation intersect with the imperative to innovate pedagogy. This mixed-methods study examined teachers' and students' perceptions of AI integration in history learning in Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan. Participants included 220 Grade XI students and six history teachers from six public senior high schools, selected through purposive sampling for school selection and maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in socioeconomic background, technological access, and geographic location. Data collection involved a validated 30-item questionnaire measuring five perceptual dimensions (AI understanding, attitudes, readiness, expectations, and barriers), along with 12 in-depth student interviews and six semi-structured teacher interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed moderate AI understanding (M = 3.19), strongly positive attitudes (M = 4.09), moderate readiness (M = 3.28), high expectations (M = 4.10), and awareness of implementation barriers (M = 2.75). Thematic analysis identified strong convergence on AI's complementary role rather than a replacement for human educators. Both groups emphasized concerns about cultural representation and infrastructure constraints. The findings recommend context-responsive AI content co-designed with local communities and equity-focused infrastructure investment to support inclusive digital pedagogy in marginalized regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhikari, R., & Timsina, T. P. (2024). An educational study focused on the application of mixed method approach as a research method. OCEM Journal of Management, Technology & Social Sciences, 3(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.3126/ocemjmtss.v3i1.62229

Afzaal, M., Shanshan, X., Yan, D., & Younas, M. (2024). Mapping artificial intelligence integration in education: A decade of innovation and impact (2013–2023) A bibliometric analysis. IEEE Access, 12, 113275–113299. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3443313

Almasri, F. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence in teaching and learning of science: A systematic review of empirical research. Research in Science Education, 54(5), 977–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10176-3

Asmayawati, Yufiarti, & Yetti, E. (2024). Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233

Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610508

Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2

Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and reflections from educational landscape: A review of AI studies in half a century. Sustainability, 13(2), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Elmersjö, H. Å. (2022). Genre positions and epistemic cognition: Swedish upper secondary school history teachers and the nature of history. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1939139

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the pluriverse: Radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816

Fadhilaturrahmi, & Ananda, R. (2025). AI-powered e-modules for mathematics learning: Impact on elementary school students’ mathematical disposition. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(2), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4910

Flick, U. (2022). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Design. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278

Freire, P. (2020). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060635

Good, K. D., & Hof, B. (2024). Towards global and local histories of educational technologies: Introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2250983

Halim, U., & Hidayat, N. (2025). The sequential levels of the digital divide in the educational domain among Indonesian university students. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 10(1), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.18326/inject.v10i1.4427

Hikmah, N., Surawan, Ansari, M. R., Endah, & Muslimah. (2022). Pelatihan peningkatan kompetensi guru dalam membuat media pembelajaran berbasis IT di SMP Muhammadiyah Palangka Raya (Training to improve teacher competency in creating IT-based learning media at Muhammadiyah Middle School, Palangka Raya). PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(5), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.33084/pengabdianmu.v7i5.3175

Hooks, B. (2014). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. In Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203700280

Hundleby, J. D., & Nunnally, J. (1968). Psychometric theory. In 3rd ed. (Ed.), American Educational Research Journal (Vol. 5, Issue 3). McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.2307/1161962

Imaduddin, F., & Firdaus, M. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: Theoretical perspectives on ICT integration in Indonesian education policy. International Journal of Education, Social Studies, and Management, 5(2), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v5i2.806

Ivanov, S. (2023). The dark side of artificial intelligence in higher education. The Service Industries Journal, 43(15–16), 1055–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2258799

Kawar, L. N., Dunbar, G. B., Aquino-Maneja, E. M., Flores, S. L., Rondez Squier, V., & Failla, K. R. (2024). Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, and triangulation research simplified. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 55(7), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20240328-03

Kebudayaan, K. P. dan. (2021). Panduan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka (Guide to implementing the Independent Curriculum). Kemendikbud RI. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). To advance AI use in education, focus on understanding educators. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00351-4

Mignolo, W. D. (2020). The darker side of western modernity. In The Darker Side of Western Modernity. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv125jqbw

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

Reyes-Parra, P. A., Navarro-Roldán, C. P., & Santisteban, A. F. (2024). Historical and critical thinking in the educational context: A systematic review. Panta Rei, 18, 269–291. https://doi.org/10.6018/pantarei.611711

Rizvi, S., Waite, J., & Sentance, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence teaching and learning in K-12 from 2019 to 2022: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100145

Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six historical thinking concepts. Nelson Education.

Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.

Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/2653993

Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Lecturers’ perceptions of spiritual leadership: A quantitative descriptive study in higher education. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 5(1), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v5i1.3682

Sugihartini, N., & Swisnandy, I. G. A. M. (2025). Augmented reality in computer systems integrated with project-based learning in vocational schools. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(2), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.5093

Sumiatie, Juwita, D. R., Susanto, Y., & Susilowati, E. (2021). Pengaruh subjektivitas dalam penulisan sejarah lokal Kalimantan Tengah (The influence of subjectivity in writing local history of Central Kalimantan). Anterior Jurnal, 21(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v21i1.2782

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 306–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635

Tengah, B. P. S. P. K. (2022). Statistik daerah provinsi kalimantan tengah 2022 (Regional statistics of Central Kalimantan province 2022). Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Vinet, L., & Zhedanov, A. (2011). A “missing” family of classical orthogonal polynomials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(8), 85201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201

Volodin, A. Y. (2025). Digital hermeneutics of historical source: Formalization as interpretation. Perm University Herald. History, 69(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2025-2-87-100

Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001

Widana, I. W., Suarta, I. M., & Citrawan, I. W. (2019). Work motivation and creativity on the teacher's ability to develop HOTS-based assessments. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 188-200. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n3.378

Widana, I. W. (2020). The effect of digital literacy on the ability of teachers to develop HOTS-based assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1503 (2020) 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012045

Widana, I. W., Sopandi, A. T., Suwardika, I. G. (2021). Development of an authentic assessment model in mathematics learning: A science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 5(1), 192-209. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i1.12992

Williyan, A., Fitriati, S. W., Pratama, H., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2024). AI as co-creator: Exploring Indonesian EFL teachers’ collaboration with AI in content development. Teaching English with Technology, 24(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.56297/vaca6841/LRDX3699/RZOH5366

Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. The History Teacher, 34(4), 439–463. https://doi.org/10.2307/494730

Yao, N. (2025). Integrating AI in historical research: A new method to analyzing national narratives. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 40(2), 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaf075

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zhafira, Hamdiyati, Y., & Nuraeni, E. (2025). Development of E-VIRA (e-module virus integrated reality-augmented): Enhance mental models and problem-solving skills. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4857

Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2024). AI in teacher education: Unlocking new dimensions in teaching support, inclusive learning, and digital literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1871–1885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12988

Downloads

Published

2026-02-15

How to Cite

Susanto, Y., Marselina, S., & Nur Halijah, S. (2026). AI integration in history education: Perceptions of teachers and students in Palangka Raya. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(4), 1218–1232. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i4.5470