Analysis of intellectual disability students' learning profiles on electron configuration material using individual education

Authors

  • Dian Novita Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Egi Rahman Permadi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Khurrotul Aini SMAN 10 Surabaya
  • Moniqsa Purbo Syahrani Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Rusmini Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i3.5445

Keywords:

Electron Configuration, Individual Education, Intellectual disabilities learning profile

Abstract

This research is motivated by the need for effective learning strategies for students with intellectual disabilities, particularly those who experience cognitive barriers. This study aims to analyze the learning profiles and outcomes of students with intellectual disabilities in relation to electron configuration materials, utilizing individualized educational learning strategies. The learning media developed is the E-LAPD (Electronic-based Student Activity Sheet), integrated through the LiveWorksheet platform. This study employs a mixed-methods research approach, a method that combines quantitative and qualitative methods. The population of this study is three students with intellectual disabilities at SMAN 10 Surabaya. The sampling technique is a saturated sample (total sampling), where the entire population is used as a research sample. Data collection techniques through test and interview methods. The test results were analyzed quantitatively, while the interview results were analyzed qualitatively using the NVivo application. The results indicate that this study can enhance the learning outcomes of students with intellectual disabilities, as evidenced by the posttest scores, which are higher than the pretest scores. Thus, this research is important in helping students with intellectual disabilities and is expected to be the basis for developing more inclusive and adaptive learning media.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Subagyo. (2020). Application of research methods: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research practices. In Media Intelligence (October issue).

Akpoghol, T. V., Ode, J. O., & Adzape, J. N. (2025). Concept mapping teaching strategy and students’ interest in basic science in makurdi , benue state , nigeria. 2, 233–241.

Alexandra. (2020). Playful strategies to develop reading and writing through the Liveworksheets platform. Cienciamatria, 6(3), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.35381/cm.v6i3.408

Anisya. (2022). Qualitative research methods. Jakarta: Bumi aksara. August, V(2), 130–137.

Budiariawan, I. P. (2019). The relationship of learning motivation with learning outcomes in chemistry subjects. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry Education, 3(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v3i2.21242

Budyawati, & Luh Putu Indah. (2020). Development of individual learning program (ppi) for children with special needs at jember inclusive school. SELING: Journal of PGRA Study Program, 6(2), 89–101.

Hake. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics.

Han, F. (2021). The relations between teaching strategies, students’ engagement in learning, and teachers’ self‐concept. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095020

Kumala, F. N., Ghufron, A., & Pujiastuti, P. (2022). Elementary school teachers’ tpack profile in science teaching based on demographic factors. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1545a

Kustawan. (2021). Inclusive education: Theory and practice in schools. Directorate of Special Education and Special Services, Ministry of Education and Culture.

Lathifah. (2021). Integrating local potential in character education courses to improve student learning outcomes and respect for the environment. JUPE: Journal of Mandala Education, 4(4), 0–5. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v4i4.995

M Rifqy Rabbani, Aistya Rimaningrum, Arimil Jannah, & Bakti Fatwa Anbiya. (2025). Transformation of lecture methods for children with special needs (abk): A case study at sdlb negeri semarang campus 2. Journal Central Publisher, 2(3), 1721–1734. https://doi.org/10.60145/jcp.v2i3.390

Mardi Fitri, D. G. R. K. Z. P. (2021). Factors causing children with special needs and classification of crew members. Bunayya : Journal of Child Education, 7(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.22373/bunayya.v7i2.10424

Parjaman, T., & Akhmad, D. (2019). As a "middle way" over the quantitative-qualitative dichotomy. Journal of Moderation, 5(4), 530–548. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/moderat

Perdana, R. (2020). Development of an individual learning program (ppi) model for children with special needs in kota metro inclusive elementary school. Improvement: Scientific Journal for Improving the Quality of Education Management, 7(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.21009/improvement.v7i2.17956

Prastika, Y., & Masniladevi. (2021). Development of Regular and Irregular Interactive E-LKPD liveworksheets on the learning outcomes of grade IV elementary school students. Journal of Basic Education Studies, 4(1), 2601–2614.

Purnadewi, G. A. A., & Widana, I. W. (2023). Improving students’ science numeration capability through the implementation of the PBL model based on local wisdom. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i3.3252

Quthni. (2024). Learning islamic religious education for children with special needs in the slow learner category at slb-abcd muhammadiyah palu thesis. Id. at 17, 302.

Riza, S., & Barrulwalidin, B. (2023). Scope of learning methods. Islamic Pedagogy: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.52029/ipjie.v1i2.157

Samsu. (2021). "Research methods: (Theory and application of qualitative, quantitative research,. mixed methods, as well as research & development)." The Legacy of Jambi.

Sari, S. N., Sarwidi, S., Nugraheni, F., Musyafa, A., & Sari, S. N. (2025). Identification of characteristics of temporary modular shelter design in disasters in indonesia through nvivo and literature review. Journal of Innovative Research, 5(3), 1929–1938. https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.1592

Sebrina, A. A., & Sukirman, D. (2019). Implementation of the curriculum in inclusive education schools. Journal of Educational Science Research, 11(2), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v11i2.19748

Sugiyono. (2011). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Alphabet.

Sugiyono. (2014). Mixed methods. Alphabet.

Suradika, A & Dirgantara, W. (2019). Research methodology. UM Jakarta Press.

Widana, I. W., Sumandya, I. W., Citrawan, I. W., Widana, I. N. S., Ibarra, F. P., Quicho, R. F., Delos Santos, M. R. H. M., Velasquez-Fajanela, J. V., & Mukminin, A. (2023). The effect of teachers’ responsibility and understanding of the local wisdom concept on teachers’ autonomy in developing evaluation of learning based on local wisdom in a special needs school. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(10), 152-167. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i10.6189

Zhang, H., Yang, J., & Liu, Z. (2024). Effect of teachers’ teaching strategies on students’ learning engagement: moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(December), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1475048

Downloads

Published

2025-11-10

How to Cite

Dian Novita, Egi Rahman Permadi, Khurrotul Aini, Moniqsa Purbo Syahrani, & Rusmini. (2025). Analysis of intellectual disability students’ learning profiles on electron configuration material using individual education. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(3), 816–831. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i3.5445