Toward global scientific literacy: Evaluating primary science education in Indonesia’s Merdeka and Cambridge curricula

Authors

  • I Komang Wisnu Budi Wijaya UHN I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar
  • I Made Yoga Parwata Universitas Dhyana Pura
  • I Putu Oktap Indrawan Politeknik Ganesha Guru
  • I Ketut Suparya IAHN Mpu Kuturan Singaraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4988

Keywords:

Cambridge curriculum, Curriculum comparison, Merdeka curriculum, Science education, Scientific literacy

Abstract

In response to global demands for 21st-century competencies, Indonesia has implemented the Merdeka Curriculum, while many internationalised schools adopt the Cambridge Curriculum. Both aim to foster scientific literacy but differ in philosophical foundations, curriculum structure, and pedagogical design. This study aims to compare the implementation of science education in these two curricula at SD Tunjung Sari, an SPK (Satuan Pendidikan Kerjasama) school in Bali, to identify their respective strengths and inform future curriculum integration. Employing a qualitative design, data were collected through document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations. The study focused on four key components: learning objectives, content, instruction, and assessment, using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model. Findings indicate that the Merdeka Curriculum emphasises holistic development and contextual learning through project-based and Science–Technology–Society (STS) approaches. At the same time, the Cambridge Curriculum promotes inquiry-based learning with a structured, internationally benchmarked sequence. Although both curricula align with PISA’s scientific literacy domains, they differ in content scope and delivery. The study recommends a hybrid model that integrates global standards with local values to enhance science education in diverse contexts. This can support policymakers and educators in designing future-ready curricula that are both globally competitive and culturally rooted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afida, R. N., Haryono, & Titi Prihatin. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of independent learning in the merdeka curriculum: A phenomenological study. Journal of Education Technology, 8(4), 734–742. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i4.86687

Amaruddin, H., Dardiri, A., Efianingrum, A., Hung, R., & Purwanta, E. (2024). Novel totto-chan by tetsuko kuroyanagi: A study of philosophy of progressivism and humanism and relevance to the merdeka curriculum in indonesia. Open Education Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0006

Citrawan, I. W., Widana, I. W., Sumandya, I. W., Widana, I. N. S., Mukminin, A., Arief, H., Razak, R. A., Hadiana, D., & Meter, W. (2024). Special education teachers’ ability in literacy and numeracy assessments based on local wisdom. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(1), 145-157. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v8i1.32608

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Fadlillah, M., Oktivianingsih, E., & Lisdayana, N. (2024). The concept of an independent curriculum with an agrarian insight in early childhood: Perspectives of indonesian teachers. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6721

Fadlillah, M., Wahab, R., & Ayriza, Y. (2020). Understanding the experience of early childhood education teachers in teaching and training student independence at school. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4163

Fatimah, A. T., Isyanto, A. Y., & Toto, T. (2023). Science, technology, engineering, agriculture, mathematics, and health in agribusiness curriculum. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(4), 2316. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.25665

Gunawan, K. D. H., & Indrawan, I. P. O. (2025). Decolonising science education: A bibliometric analysis of indigenous knowledge integration in global stem. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(5), 2598–2622. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1651

Hairudin, H., Suriansyah, A., & Saleh, M. (2023). Principal’s strategy in developing teacher pedagogic and professional competency to improve education quality (multi-case study at sman 1 lampihong and sman 1 tebing tinggi). International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 06(06). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i6-31

Limiansi, K., Aw, S., Paidi, P., & Setiawan, C. (2023). Biology teachers’ perspective on change of curriculum policy: A case for implementation of “independent” curriculum. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6204

Mareza, L. (2021). The role of class teachers in the implementation of guidance and counseling in the formation of characters in children with special needs. Proceedings of The 6th Asia-Pacific Education And Science Conference, AECon 2020, 19-20 December 2020, Purwokerto, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-12-2020.2309191

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Minsih, M., Mujahid, I., Mukminin, A., & Helzi, H. (2025). The integration of culture literacy in strengthening the profile of pancasila students in science learning for elementary schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(2), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i2.41764

Mutmainah, M., Sundari, H., & Juhana, J. (2023). English teachers’ perceptions and practices of differentiated instruction (di) in the merdeka curriculum. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 7(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v7i1.8261

Nadhirah, A., & Puspitasari, A. D. (2024). Analisis sikap percaya diri siswa melalui kegiatan menarik dan menantang pramuka pada kelas ii uptd sdn gili timur 2 bangkalan. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurripen.v3i1.2675

Nadifa, M., & Zulvani, N. V. (2024). School literacy policy as an effort to strengthen 21st-century skills. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 5(1), 16-34. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v5i1.3527

OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills 2030: Executive Summary. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en

Purnadewi, G. A. A., & Widana, I. W. (2023). Improving students’ science numeration capability through the implementation of the PBL model based on local wisdom. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i3.3252

Rachman, A., Putro, H. Y. S., Rusandi, M. A., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). The development and validation of the “kuesioner tema proyek penguatan profil pelajar pancasila” (KT P5): A new tool for strengthening the pancasila student profile in indonesian pioneer schools. Heliyon, 10(16), e35912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35912

Rahmah, L., Purwanta, E., Wijayanti, W., & Suhardiman, S. (2024). Navigating the curriculum landscape: The impact of curriculum 2013 and merdeka curriculum on teachers’ and students’ learning outcomes in indonesia. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(6), 917–931. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i6.4061

Ray, S., Ball, L., Crowley, J., Laur, C., Rajput-Ray, M., & Gillam, S. (2014). Nutrition in medical education: Reflections from an initiative at the university of cambridge. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 209. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S59071

Rohsulina, P., Setyowati, D. L., Priyanto, A. S., & Utomo, C. B. (2024). Project based learning model-eco pedagogy on environmental health material in public junior high schools in sukoharjo regency. Edelweiss applied science and technology, 8(5), 2436–2446. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i5.2014

Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.

Sarkity, D., & Fernando, A. (2023). Maritime-related topics on natural science learning in independent curriculum. BIO Web of Conferences, 79, 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20237902003

Shoufika, H. F., Diana, E., & Ardana, R. L. (2024). STEM-based digital assessment application for elementary school teacher education students. BIO Web of Conferences, 117, 01026. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202411701026

Suhardita, K., Widana, I. W., Degeng, I. N. S., Muslihati, M., & Indreswari, H. (2024). Sharing behavior in the context of altruism is a form of strategy for building empathy and solidarity. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 5(3), 316-324. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v5i3.4145

Supriyanto, La Hadisi, Pairin, Dirman, & Raehang. (2025). Facing the challenges of globalization: Transforming madrasah education from bilingual to international classrooms. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v8i1.125

Supriyoko, S., Nisa, A. F., & Uktolseja, N. F. (2022). The nature-based school curriculum: A solution to learning-teaching that promotes students’ freedom. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(3), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i3.47903

Syamsy, B., Fauzan, U., & Malihah, N. (2023). Implementasi peningkatan mutu pendidikan dengan pendekatan total quality manajemen. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(4), 888–902. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i4.593

Syofyan, H., Fadli, M. R., Lestari, M. R. D. W., & Rosyid, A. (2025). Optimizing science learning through differentiated models to improve science literacy in the digital era. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(6), 2025182. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025182

Syofyan, H., Oktian Fajar Nugroho, Ainur Rosyid, & Syahrizal Dwi Putra. (2022). Dimensions of pancasila student profile in science learning PGSD students. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 5(3), 514–523. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v5i3.56308

Widana, I. W., Sumandya, I. W., Citrawan, I. W. (2023). The special education teachers’ ability to develop an integrated learning evaluation of Pancasila student profiles based on local wisdom for special needs students in Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44(2), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2023.44.2.23

Widiana, I. W., Parwata, I. G. L. A., Jampel, I. N., & Tegeh, I. M. (2024). The needs of a metacognitive-based learning model in elementary schools. Nurture, 18(2), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.55951/nurture.v18i2.627

Wijayanti, D., Kusuma, A. Y., Sari, D. I. P., & Pratomo, W. (2024). An analysis of classroom management in social science learning to strengthen character education in class v at sd negeri kandangan 1 sleman yogyakarta. Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 8(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.30738/tc.v8i1.17231

Winarto, W., Kristyaningrum, D. H., Rahayu, R., Hayu, W. R. R., Jumini, S., & Dewi, N. D. L. (2024). Science teachers’ perceptions of differentiated learning: A survey study. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(2), 2025101. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025101

Yasa, I. M. W., Budi Wijaya, I. K. W., Indrawan, I. P. O., Muliani, N. M., & Darmayanti, N. W. S. (2022). The implementation profile of the science literacy movement in elementary schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i2.45174

Downloads

Published

2025-08-11

How to Cite

Wijaya, I. K. W. B. ., Parwata, I. M. Y. ., Indrawan, I. P. O. ., & Suparya, I. K. . (2025). Toward global scientific literacy: Evaluating primary science education in Indonesia’s Merdeka and Cambridge curricula. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(2), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4988

Issue

Section

Articles