Culturally responsive teaching assisted by interactive media: Effects on learning activity and mathematics achievement

Authors

  • Aditiyaningtiyas Aditiyaningtiyas Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Joko Sulianto Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Iin Purnamasari Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v7i2.7041

Keywords:

Culturally responsive teaching, Interactive media, Learning activity, Mathematics achievement, Primary education

Abstract

Low mathematics learning activity and achievement remain challenges in primary education. Preliminary assessment showed that only 2 of 14 third-grade students (14.3%) achieved the minimum mastery criterion (KKM = 70), with a mean pretest score of 43.50. However, limited evidence has examined the integrated use of Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) and interactive media while simultaneously evaluating learning activity and mathematics achievement through MANOVA. This study examined their effects on both outcomes. A quantitative quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design involved 28 third-grade students, with 14 students each in the experimental and control groups. Data were collected using a learning activity observation sheet and mathematics achievement test and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Shapiro–Wilk, Levene’s test, independent-samples t-tests, and MANOVA. The results showed significant differences in learning activity (t(26) = 5.92, p < .001) and mathematics achievement (t(26) = 3.85, p = .001), favoring the experimental group. MANOVA confirmed a significant simultaneous effect (Pillai’s Trace = .63, F(2, 25) = 21.75, p < .001, partial η² = .63). The study provides a multivariate perspective on both outcomes and a practical instructional alternative for elementary mathematics teachers. Future research should involve larger samples, multiple schools, and longer interventions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aktaş, B. M., Omwami, A., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Mäkelä, M. (2024). Obstacles, solutions and creative agencies: How forces and agencies shape the learning process of weaving. The Design Journal, 27(1), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2023.2280341

Ariyanti, M. R. D., Sulianto, J., & Buchori, A. (2025). Development of media EDUMEDIG with the model problem-based learning to improve science understanding. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(3), 1055–1070. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i3.5614

Basuki, B. P., Waris, & Adhim, F. (2026). Development of an educational mathematics game to enhance motivation and activity of elementary school students. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 15(1), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v15i1.13218

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Decristan, J., Jansen, N. C., & Fauth, B. (2023). Student participation in whole-class discourse: Individual conditions and consequences for student learning in primary and secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 86, Article 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101748

Dreher, A., Wang, T.-Y., Feltes, P., Hsieh, F.-J., & Lindmeier, A. (2024). High-quality use of representations in the mathematics classroom A matter of the cultural perspective? ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(5), 965–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01597-5

Falloon, G. (2023). Twelve years of iPads and apps in schools: What conditions support effective practices in K–6 classrooms? Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1122522, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1122522

Fatoni, M. R., & Bektiningsih, K. (2024). Articulate Storyline interactive learning media on the topic of plant anatomy. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 12(1), 73–82. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPGSD/article/view/68736

Hay, P. (2024). Creative pedagogies: School without walls and forest of imagination. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 43(3), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12512

Jaya, S., Hamzah, S., & Yunita, W. (2025). Needs analysis for critical reading e-book based on problem-based learning: Perspectives from EFL students, lecturers, and stakeholders. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i1.4682

Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., & Palonen, T. (2025). Cognitive engagement and knowledge construction in technology-enhanced learning. Learning and Instruction, 92, Article 101897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.101897

Li, J. C.-H., Nesca, M., Waisman, R. M., Cheng, Y., Tze, V. M. C., & Johnson, N. (2021). A robust effect size measure Aw for MANOVA with non-normal and non-homogenous data. Methodological Innovations, 14(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991211055949

Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), Article 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059

Nolan, K., & Xenofontos, C. (2023). Mapping teachers’ perspectives on culturally responsive pedagogy in mathematics: From academic achievement to insights and opportunities. Intercultural Education, 34(6), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2023.2265855

Ntumi, S. (2021). Reporting and interpreting multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA): Adopting the best practices in educational research. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 12(14), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.14505/jres.v12.14.05

Nurhasanah, M., Suprapto, P. K., & Ardiansyah, R. (2024). The effectiveness of problem-based learning assisted by Articulate Storyline interactive students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v10i1.64847

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-enPISA. (2023). PISA 2022 Results. Factsheets, I, 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Powell, S. R. (2023). Developing fraction magnitude understanding through measurement-based instruction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 70, Article 101032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101032

Psyllou, M., Dawood, M., & Suleymenova, K. (2023). Scaffolded formative assessment: Fit for purpose? Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(4), Article 15. [Perlu verifikasi DOI/URL penerbit sebelum final submission.]

Quane, K., & Ní Ríordáin, M. (2025). The confluence of attitudes towards mathematics and pedagogical practice: Evaluating the use of mathematical manipulatives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 37, 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-024-00494-0

Rifayanti, Z. E. T., Mustaji, Mariana, N., & Suryanti. (2024). Enhancing critical thinking and problem-solving skills in upper elementary students through game-based learning. Perspectives of Science and Education, 70(4), 396–420. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.4.25

Robson, J., & LeVoguer, M. (2025). Reflections from the higher education classroom: The role of playful pedagogy in the professional formation of early childhood students. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 33(2), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2024.2431538

Shultz, M., Close, E., Nissen, J., & Van Dusen, B. (2024). Enacting culturally relevant pedagogy when “mathematics has no color”: Epistemological contradictions in undergraduate mathematics instruction. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 10(2), 486–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-023-00219-x

Singh, D., & Rajendran, R. (2024). Cognitive engagement as a predictor of learning gain in Python programming. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 58, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00330-9

Suh, J., & Park, S. (2023). Student-centered mathematics instruction for enhancing conceptual understanding: A systematic review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(8), 2479–2501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10373-y

Timmerman, M. A. (2023). Student mathematics learning activities. In A. Manizade, N. Buchholtz, & K. Beswick (Eds.), The evolution of research on teaching mathematics: International perspectives in the digital era (pp. 157–196). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31193-2_6

Tran, L. M., & Castro Schepers, O. (2023). Making mathematics meaningful for culturally and linguistically diverse students with a mathematics learning disability: A focus on culturally responsive practices. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1276423. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1276423

Widana, I. W. (2022). Meta-analysis: The relationship between self-regulated learning and mathematical critical reasoning. Education.Innovation.Diversity, 1(4), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.17770/eid2022.1.6739

Widana, I. W., & Laksitasari, B. D. (2023). Improving students' learning outcomes on circle equation material using GeoGebra software. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(1), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i1.2792

Widana, I. W., Wulandari, V. A., & Sudiarta, I. M. (2024). Improving mathematics learning outcomes of the Pythagorean theorem through the Jigsaw type cooperative method. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(4), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i4.3464

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Aditiyaningtiyas, A., Sulianto, J., & Purnamasari, I. (2026). Culturally responsive teaching assisted by interactive media: Effects on learning activity and mathematics achievement. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 7(2), 861–874. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v7i2.7041

Issue

Section

Articles