A rational decision-making learning model to enhance elementary students' environmental understanding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v7i1.6268Keywords:
Elementary students, Environmental understanding, Multimodal teaching materials, Rational decision-making learning models, Socio-scientific issuesAbstract
Environmental literacy is a critical competency for elementary students, yet many pedagogical approaches lack structured frameworks connecting environmental issues to real-world decision-making. This study aimed to enhance students' environmental understanding through a rational decision-making learning model supported by interactive digital multimodal teaching materials based on socioscientific issues (SSI). A pre-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design was employed with 75 fifth-grade students in Cimahi City, West Java, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a validated environmental understanding test that measured knowledge of causes, impacts, and solutions to environmental problems, and were then analyzed using Wilcoxon tests. Results showed a statistically significant improvement in students' environmental understanding. The model enabled students to think systematically by connecting causes, consequences, and solutions to environmental problems, while promoting critical reasoning and active engagement in learning. These findings suggest that integrating decision-making frameworks with multimodal SSI materials can effectively support environmental literacy in primary education. Future studies should apply this model across broader populations and examine its long-term impact on students' environmental attitudes and behavior. This study is limited to fifth-grade students in a single city; thus, its generalizability requires further investigation.
Downloads
References
Badertscher, E. M. (2006). Thinking: The foundation of critical and creative learning in the classroom. Science Education, 90(1), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20118
Blyznyuk, T., & Kachak, T. (2024). Benefits of interactive learning for students’ critical thinking skills improvement. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 11(1), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.11.1.94-102
Cairncross, S., & Mannion, M. (2001). Interactive multimedia and learning: Realizing the benefits. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290110035428
Cenk, A. G., & Ercan Yalman, F. (2022). The observation of pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills on different socioscientific issues. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.900562
Chan, J., & Erduran, S. (2025). Future-oriented science learning and its effects on students’ emotions, futures literacy and agency in the anthropocene. Research in Science Education, 55(4), 899–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10213-1
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Fifth edition). Sage.
Dea, E. (2024). Desain implementasi materi ajar berbasis multimedia dan animasi interaktif (Studi kasus di sekolah dasar SDN 014721 empat negeri) (Design of implementation of teaching materials based on multimedia and interactive animation (Case study at SDN 014721 Empat Negeri Elementary School). Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Bangsa, 1(6), 556–561. https://doi.org/10.59837/jpnmb.v1i6.108
Demirci, S., Reid, A., Teksöz, G., & Sahin, E. (2025). Systems literacy: Towards a conspectus and model for environmental and sustainability education. Environmental Education Research, 31(4), 856–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2024.2409959
Devkota, J., & Basyal, D. K. (2024). Intervention strategies in nepal’s school-level education programs for the country’s socioeconomic transformation. International Education Studies, 17(5), 45. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v17n5p45
Ekowati, D. W., Husamah, H., Setyaningrum, R. W., & Sumarsono, P. (2024). The trend of multimodal use in school learning from the past to the future: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(4), 1548. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i4.12669
Evi Yupani & Widana, I. W. (2023). The impacts of the stem-based inquiry learning models on critical thinking and concept mastery. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 7(1), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v7i1.24227
Fauville, G., Queiroz, A. C. M., & Bailenson, J. N. (2020). Virtual reality as a promising tool to promote climate change awareness. Dalam Technology and Health (hlm. 91–108). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816958-2.00005-8
Fazio, X., Gallagher, T. L., & DeKlerk, C. (2022). Exploring adolescents’ critical reading of socioscientific topics using multimodal texts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(S1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10280-8
Gough, N. (2002). Moral outrage in education. Science Education, 86(4), 596–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10048
Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching: A grounded theory study of how science teachers collaboratively design SSI-based curricula. Science & Education, 28(6–7), 639–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00065-x
Jaime, M., Salazar, C., Alpizar, F., & Carlsson, F. (2023). Can school environmental education programs make children and parents more pro-environmental? Journal of Development Economics, 161(1), 103032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.103032
Kinskey, M., & Zeidler, D. (2021). Elementary preservice teachers' challenges in designing and implementing socioscientific issues-based lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560x.2020.1826079
Levy, Y., & J. Ellis, T. (2011). A guide for novice researchers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies in information systems research. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 6(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.28945/1373
Lestari, T. A., Idrus, A., & Sofyan, S. (2023). The influence of self-efficacy, self-actualization, and learning environment on achievement motives of class XII students of SMA Adhyaksa I Kota Jambi. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i1.2737
Liana Mumrikoh, Djono, D., & Drajati, N. A. (2023). Urgency of E-books based multimodal approach towards reading motivation for elementary school students. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.59399
López-Fernández, M. D. M., González-García, F., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2022). How can socio-scientific issues help develop critical thinking in chemistry education? A reflection on the problem of plastics. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(10), 3435–3442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00223
Macalalag, A. Z., Johnson, J., & Lai, M. (2020). How do we do this: Learning how to teach socioscientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09944-9
Machin-Mastromatteo, J. D. (2021). Information and digital literacy initiatives. Information Development, 37(3), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211031695
Mambrey, S., Timm, J., Landskron, J. J., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). The impact of system specifics on systems thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1632–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21649
Manohari, L. & Purwati, R. (2023). Implementation of the discovery learning model based on think pair share to improve students’ learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i1.2686
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204(1), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
Moss, D. M. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016030
Mousavi, F., Oteros, J., Shahali, Y., & Carinanos, P. (2024). Impacts of climate change on allergenic pollen production: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 349(1), 109948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109948
Olsson, D., Gericke, N., & Boeve-de Pauw, J. (2022). The effectiveness of education for sustainable development revisited – a longitudinal study on secondary students’ action competence for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 28(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2033170
Palmer, T.-A., Burke, P. F., & Aubusson, P. (2017). Why school students choose and reject science: A study of the factors that students consider when selecting subjects. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1299949
Paufler, N. A., King, K. M., & Zhu, P. (2020). Promoting professional growth in new teacher evaluation systems: Practitioners’ lived experiences in changing policy contexts. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100873
Purnadewi, G. A. A., & Widana, I. W. (2023). Improving students’ science numeration capability through the implementation of the PBL model based on local wisdom. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i3.3252
Rahayu, G. D. S., Jayadinata, A. K., & Kelana, J. B. (2026). Interactive digital multimodal teaching materials based on socio-scientific issues to improve the ability to read socio-scientific texts and critical thinking of elementary school students. International Journal of Language Education, 10(1), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v10i1.83710
Rahayu, G. D. S., Maftuh, B., Sapriya, S., & Sopandi, W. (2024a). Model pembelajaran pengambilan keputusan rasional berbasis isu sosiosaintifik. Nawa Utama.
Rahayu, G. D. S., Maftuh, B., Sapriya, & Sopandi, W. (2024b). Development of a rational decision-making learning model based on socioscientific issues for students’ information literacy. Is it effective? in M. A. Wulandari, D. S. Wardani, A. Hendriyanto, C. Sutinah, G. D. S. Rahayu, S. Murni, D. Fardian, S. Sahara, L. H. Muhaimin, & I. Pauji (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Technology (ICTLT 2023) (Vol. 825, hlm. 127–135). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-206-4_15
Rahayu, G. D. S., Maftuh, B., & Sopandi, W. (2022). Decision-making abilities of elementary school students on socio-scientific issues based energy materials assisted by scratch application media. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 1(1), 81–87.
Rahayu, S., Muntari, M., Harjono, A., Makhrus, M., Kurniadin, Muh. Z., Sarwanto, S., & Mohtar, S. H. (2025). Development of science E-books based on local wisdom to improve digital literacy and students’ critical thinking skills as an innovation to improve education sustainable developments goals (ESDG). Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i1.14723
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
Setiadi, A., Rochayati, U., Hartopo, I., & Handito, T. (2025). Production-based teaching factory learning model: Enhancing soft skills and simulating the industrial environment. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(2), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4679
Shafira, Z. D., & Rahayu, G. D. S. (2025). Penggunaan model pembelajaran pengambilan keputusan rasional untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pengambilan keputusan siswa sekolah dasar kelas V (The use of rational decision-making learning models to improve the decision-making abilities of fifth-grade elementary school students). COLLASE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), 08(04), 729–737. https://doi.org/10.22460/collase.v8i4.27564
Uskola, A., & Puig, B. (2023). Development of systems and futures thinking skills by primary pre-service teachers for addressing epidemics. Research in Science Education, 53(4), 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10097-7
Viehmann, C., Fernández Cárdenas, J. M., & Reynaga Peña, C. G. (2024). The use of socioscientific issues in science lessons: A scoping review. Sustainability, 16(14), 5827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145827
Widana, I. W., & Umam, E. K. (2023). Improving mathematics learning outcomes using the mind mapping method for students of SMPN 8 Denpasar. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v8i2.397
Widana, I. W., Wulandari, V. A., & Sudiarta, I. M. (2024). Improving mathematics learning outcomes of the Pythagorean theorem through the Jigsaw type cooperative method. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(4), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i4.3464
Yatri, I., Latifah, N., & Ninawati, M. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of multimodal text-based whole-language learning materials for children. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(4), 5040–5052. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5908
Yulianto, A., Sopandi, W., Riandi, R., & Hamdu, G. (2025). A decade-long trend in the development of systems thinking skills on science learning: Contributions to elementary schools. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 11(2), 723. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v11i2.15279
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M., Van De Schoot-Hubeek, W., Lek, K., Hoijtink, H., & Van De Schoot, R. (2017). Application and evaluation of an expert judgment elicitation procedure for correlations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00090
Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48(1), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Galih Dani Septiyan Rahayu, Asep Kurnia Jayadinata, Jajang Bayu Kelana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.
