Enhancing students' cognitive and science process skills through inquiry-based virtual experiments on electricity concepts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v7i1.5999Keywords:
Cognitive Skills, Inquiry-based learning, Science process skills, Virtual experimentAbstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of inquiry-based virtual experiments in improving elementary students' cognitive skills and science process skills in learning electricity concepts. The integration of digital simulations into elementary science instruction has become increasingly important for supporting conceptual understanding and scientific inquiry, particularly for abstract topics such as electricity. The population consisted of sixth-grade students at a public elementary school, from whom 25 were selected using purposive sampling based on technological readiness and curriculum alignment. The study employed a quasi-experimental design using a one-group pretest–posttest approach. The learning intervention was implemented through four inquiry-based sessions using PhET Interactive Simulations (Circuit Construction Kit: DC). Data were collected using two validated multiple-choice instruments: a 17-item cognitive test aligned with five levels of Bloom's Revised Taxonomy and an 18-item science process skills test measuring six indicators, including observing, classifying, predicting, interpreting data, drawing conclusions, and communicating. The instruments demonstrated good internal consistency (KR-21 = 0.83). Data were analyzed descriptively by comparing pretest and posttest scores. The results showed an increase in students' posttest mean scores, reaching 79.3% for cognitive skills and 73.1% for science process skills.
Downloads
References
Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103327
Al-nakhle, H. (2022). The effectiveness of scenario-based virtual laboratory simulations to improve learning outcomes and scientific report writing skills. PLOS ONE, 17(11), e0277359-. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277359
Anam, R. S. (2020). The analysis of science process skills on pre-service elementary school teachers. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v7i2.6470
Anam, R. S. (2021). Identifying science content knowledge of primary school pre-service teachers at the essential physics concepts. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i2.1899
Anam, R. S., Gumilar, S., & Handayani, M. (2025). The effects of teaching with real, virtual, and real-virtual experimentation modes on conceptual knowledge and science process skills among sixth-grade primary school students: a case study on concepts of electricity. Education 3-13, 53(3), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2192224
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2021). Effect of integrating physics education technology simulations on students’ conceptual understanding in physics: A review of literature. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 23108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023108
Baran, B., Yecan, E., Kaptan, B., & Paşayiğit, O. (2020). Using augmented reality to teach fifth grade students about electrical circuits. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1371–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10001-9
Chen, K.-F., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, M.-R. A. (2024). Effects of a concept mapping-guided virtual laboratory learning approach on students’ science process skills and behavioral patterns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 1623–1651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10348-y
Evi Yupani & Widana, I. W. (2023). The impacts of the stem-based inquiry learning models on critical thinking and concept mastery. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 7(1), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v7i1.24227
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods : A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods : A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introduc. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/Gain scores. Dept. of Physics, Indiana University.
Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2019). Student-question-based inquiry in science education. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1658059
I Made Elia Cahaya, I. M. E., Suryaningsih, N. M. A., Parwata, I. M. Y., Poerwati, C. E. (2024). The influence of a guided inquiry learning model in improving students’ creative thinking abilities: A meta-analysis study. (2024). Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 5(3), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v5i3.4211
Juniantari, M., Ulfa, S., Sariyasa, & Suryawan, I. P. P. (2025). The effect of mobile seamless inquiry media on conceptual mathematics learning outcomes in trigonometry. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(2), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i2.4877
Kaneza, P., Nkurunziza, J. B., Twagilimana, I., Mapulanga, T., & Bwalya, A. (2024). Analysis of conceptual understanding of solutions and titration among Rwandan secondary school students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2315834. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2315834
Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Integrating inquiry-based learning in the new greek primary science curriculum. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(6), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.6.899
Kranz, J., Baur, A., & Möller, A. (2023). Learners’ challenges in understanding and performing experiments: A systematic review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 321–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2138151
Mahsup, Syaharudin, Nepomuceno, M., & Jali, H. (2026). Effectiveness of guided inquiry learning and self-regulated learning on students' numeracy skills. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 6(4), 1427–1440. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v6i4.5756
OECD. (2023). PISA 2025 science framework: Scientific literacy for the future. In https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2025-science-framework.pdf. OECD Publishing.
Papalazarou, N., Lefkos, I., & Fachantidis, N. (2024). The effect of physical and virtual inquiry-based experiments on students’ attitudes and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10088-3
Ploj Virtič, M. (2022). Teaching science & technology: Somponents of scientific literacy and insight into the steps of research. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1916–1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414
Purnadewi, G. A. A., & Widana, I. W. (2023). Improving students’ science numeration capability through the implementation of the PBL model based on local wisdom. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED), 4(3), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.59672/ijed.v4i3.3252
Reyes, R. L., Isleta, K. P., Regala, J. D., & Bialba, D. M. R. (2024). Enhancing experiential science learning with virtual labs: A narrative account of merits, challenges, and implementation strategies. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13061
Reyes, R. L., & Villanueva, J. A. (2024). Narrative-based concept representations: fostering visual cognition in the introductory chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(3), 1106–1119. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01151
Sengul, O. (2024). Epistemological beliefs and classroom practices of experienced physics teachers: are they related? Frontiers in Education, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1362426
Shen, J., Qi, H., Mei, R., & Sun, C. (2024). A comparative study on the effectiveness of online and in-class team-based learning on student performance and perceptions in virtual simulation experiments. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05080-3
Siegel, A. A., Zarb, M., Alshaigy, B., Blanchard, J., Crick, T., Glassey, R., Hott, J. R., Latulipe, C., Riedesel, C., Senapathi, M., Simon, & Williams, D. (2022). Teaching through a global pandemic: Educational landscapes before, during and after COVID-19. Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502870.3506565
Taşar, M. F. , & Heron, P. R. L. (Eds. ). (2023). The international handbook of physics education research: Learning physics (M. F. Taşar & P. R. L. Heron, Eds.). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735425477
Tsivitanidou, O. E., Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2021). A learning experience in inquiry-based physics with immersive virtual reality: Student perceptions and an interaction effect between conceptual gains and attitudinal profiles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(6), 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09924-1
Wahyudi, M. N. A., Budiyanto, C. W., Widiastuti, I., Hatta, P., & Bakar, Mohd. S. Bin. (2024). understanding virtual laboratories in engineering education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 7(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v7i2.85271
Widana, I. W., Sumandya, I. W., Sukendra, K., Sudiarsa, I. W. (2020). Analysis of conceptual understanding, digital literacy, motivation, divergent thinking, and creativity on the teacher's skills in preparing HOTS-based assessments. Jour of Adv Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 12(8), 459-466. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I8/20202612
Yani, L. P., & Widiyatmoko, A. (2023). The effectiveness of the PhET-assisted creative problem solving model on students’ creative thinking abilities and cognitive learning outcomes. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v9i2.45902
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rifat Shafwatul Anam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.
