TANTANGAN MENGGUNAKAN LITERASI SAIN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59672/sembio.v1.2276Abstract
Literasi diperlukan untuk mengkostruksi dan mengevaluasi sains melalui keaksaraan dasar, sehingga memperoleh keterampilan untuk memproses dan menggunakan kata. Pengetahuan tentang literasi yang memuat konten, pemahaman dan praktek ilmiah, diperlukan karena mengidentifikasi berbagai interaksi dengan berbagai macam informasi untuk mengambil keputusan, khususnya dalam mengembangkan kompetensi guru yang berorientasi pada pengembangan kompetensi siswa. Literasi dan kompetenensi guru sangat berkaitan dengan pilar pembelajaran TPACk, namun untuk menerapkan literasi dengan maksimal dalam proses pembelajaran memerlukan monitoring dan assessment sesuai dengan dinamika dan kebutuhan di eranya.
Downloads
References
Bach, C. (2010). Learning analytics: Targeting instruction, curricula and student support.
Office of the Provost, Drexel University.
Bailey, A. L., Maher, C. A., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2018). Language, literacy, and learning in the STEM disciplines: How language counts for English learners. Routledge.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer.
Boriani, A. (n.d.), 2014. Tools for promoting science literacy.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development.
Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.
Eika, E. (2021). Learning in Higher Education Under the Covid-19 Pandemic: Were Students More Engaged or Less?
Fatimah, F. M., & Anggrisia, N. F. (2019). The effectiveness of 7e learning model to improve scientific literacy. International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity-" Interdisciplinary Challenges for Humanity Education in Digital Era"(STEACH 2018), 18–22.
Feerrar, J. (2019). Development of a framework for digital literacy. Reference Services Review.
Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185.
Fulmer, G. W., Tanas, J., & Weiss, K. A. (2018). The challenges of alignment for the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1076–1100.
Gronlund, N. E. (1998). Assessment of student achievement. ERIC.
Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (2012). The logic of education. Routledge.
Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary MA Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106.
Hofer, M., & Harris, J. (2012). TPACK research with inservice teachers: Where’s the TCK? Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 4704–4709.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Howard, K. N., Stapleton, E. K., Nelms, A. A., Ryan, K. C., & Segura-Totten, M. (2021).
Insights on biology student motivations and challenges when reading and analyzing primary literature. Plos One, 16(5), e0251275.
Indonesia, P. R. (n.d.). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Joyce, B., Calhoun, E., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Models of learning, tools for teaching. McGraw- Hill Education (UK).
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Kyllonen, P. C. (2012). Measurement of 21st century skills within the common core state standards. Invitational Research Symposium on Technology Enhanced Assessments, 7–8.
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.
Li, Y., & Guo, M. (2021). Scientific Literacy in Communicating Science and Socio-Scientific Issues: Prospects and Challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 758000.
Liu, S.-Y., Lin, C.-S., & Tsai, C.-C. (2011). College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95(3), 497–517
Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Taylor & Francis.
Monari, J. M. (2020). Higher Order Questions for Higher Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Education and Research, 8, 1–8.
Nappi, J. S. (2017). The importance of questioning in developing critical thinking skills. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 84(1), 30.
National Academies of Sciences & Medicine. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences.
OECD, by, O. P., Publishing, O., élèves, P. international pour le suivi des acquis des, Assessment, P. for I. S., & service), S. (Online. (2006). PISA Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. OECD.
Peña-López, I. (2012). Pisa 2012 assessment and analytical framework. Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy.
Pendidikan, K., & Indonesia, K. R. (2013). Implementasi kurikulum 2013. Tersedia Di Https://Pengawasmadrasah. Files. Wordpress. Com/2013/11/7-Panduanpenilaian- Kompetensi-Sikap-2013. Pdf (Di Akses 17-4-2015).
Poli, R. (2021). The challenges of futures literacy. Futures, 132, 102800.
Quansah, F. (2018). Traditional or performance assessment: What is the right way in assessing leaners. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 21–24.
Shamsiev, J. M. U., Rashidova, R. R., & Tajibaev, M. A. (2021). THE ROLE OF TEACHERS IN BUILDING THE FUTURE OF THE NATION. Scientific Progress, 1(5), 33–37.
Spencer, H. (1884). What knowledge is of most worth (Vol. 3). JB Alden.
Spitzer, W., & Fraser, J. (2020). Advancing community science literacy. Journal of Museum Education, 45(1), 5–15.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 SEMBIO: Seminar Nasional Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Sewagti agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access) .
