Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga & Kesehatan pada SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Mukomuko melalui Pendekatan Model Context, Input, Process & Product (CIPP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3881891Keywords:
pendidikan jasmani, pendekatan model CIPPAbstract
Salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan dan memperbaiki program pendidikan yaitu dengan
melakukan evaluasi terhadap program tersebut. Tujuan penelitianini adalah untuk mendapatkan data tentang kualitas program pendidikan jasmani dan olahraga, melalui evaluasi Context, Input, Process dan Product. Sesuai dengan tujuan penelitian, jenis penelitian ini dikategorikan sebagai penelitian evaluasi dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Pemilihan subjek penelitian menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Subjek penelitian ini adalah SMP Negeri yang ada dalam wilayah Kabupaten Mukomuko. Data penelitian diperoleh melalui sebaran angket guru dan siswa, observasi, analisis dokumen, checklist, wawancara dan dokumentasi. Analisis data menggunakan metode statistik deskriptif. Hasil evaluasi program pembelajaran PJOK pada SMP Negeri Se-Kabupaten Mukomuko, rata-rata penilaian menunjukan (1) komponen context berada pada kategori “kurang baik”, dimana tujuan pembelajaran tidak dirumuskan dengan baik (44,50%); (2) komponen input pada kategori “cukup baik”, masih ada guru yang tidak memiliki perangkat pembelajaran dan sarana prasarana serta kurangnya peran kepala sekolah dalam pengawasan (59%); (3) komponen process dalam kategori “cukup baik”, yaitu waktu pelaksanaan pembelajaran yang tidak efektif dan proses pembelajaran masih berpusat pada guru sebagai sumber belajar utama serta kurangnya partisipasi siswa dalam aktifitas fisik (58,15%); (4) komponen product berada pada kategori “tidak baik”, yaitu rendahnya minat siswa terhadap pendidikan jasmani olahraga dan kesehatan (45,1%).
Downloads
References
Annarino, A. A. 1983. The TeachingLearning Process : A SystematicInstructional Strategy.
Journal of Physical Education, Recreation &Dance, 54:3, 51-53
Arikunto, S. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan : Edisi 2. Jakarta : PT Bumi Aksara.
Baan, A. B. 2012. The Development of Physical Education Teacher Professional Standards
Competency. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, ISSN 2252-6900
Bailey, R. 2006. Physical Education and Sport in Schools : A Review of Benefitsand Outcomes. Journal of School Health, Vol. 76, No. 8, American School Health Association.
Brezzo, R. D., Glave, A. P., Gray, M. & Lirgg, C. D. 2012. Comparison of a PE4LIFE Curriculum to a Traditional Physical Education Curriculum. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 12(3), Art 38, pp.245-252.
Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., Sandford, R. & BERA Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy Special Interest Group. 2009. The Educational Benefits Claimed For Physical Education and School Sport : An Academic Review. Research Papers in Education 24:1, 1-27.
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D. & Wubbels, T. 2010. Teacher learning in the contextof educational innovation : Learning activities and learning outcomes ofexperienced teachers. Elsevier Ltd. Journal Learning and Instruction 20 (2010) 533-548.
Bharvad, A. J. 2010. Curriculum Evaluation. Research Analysis and Evaluation, International Research Journal ISSN- 0975-3486 RNI : Rajbil 2009/30097 Vol I, Issue 12.
Brezzo, R.D., Glave, A.P., Gray, M. & Lirgg, C. D. 2012. Comparison of PE4LIFE Curriculum to a Traditional Physical Education Curriculum. Journal of Physical Education and Sports (JPES), 12(3), Art 38, pp.245-252.
Castelli, D. M., Hillman, C. H., Buck, S. M. & Erwin, H. E. 2007. Physical Fitness and Academic Achievement in Third- and Fifth-Grade Students. Human Kinetics, Inc. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 239- 252.
Clemente, F., Rocha, R. F. & Korgaokar, A. 2012. Teaching Physical Education : The Usefulness of the Teaching Games for Understanding and theConstraints-Led Approach. Journal of Physical Education and Sport (JPES), 12(4), Art 62, pp. 417 – 426.
Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. 2008. Child and Adolescent Development an Advanced Course. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
Donnelly, J. E. & Lambourne, K. 2011. Classroom-Based Physical Activity,Cognition, and Academic Achievement. Energy Balance Laboratory & Center for Physical Activity & Weight Management, University of Kansas, USA. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Dwiyogo, W. D. 2014. Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Model Rancangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning (PBBL) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pemecahan Masalah. Universitas Negeri Malang. JurnalPendidikan dan Pembelajaran, Volume 21, Nomor 1.
Fikri, I. K. & Mudjihartono. 2016. The Application of Game Models to PromoteStudent Participation in Learning Rounders Game Activities. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga Volume 1 Nomor 1.
Hammond, L. D., Beardsley, A. A., Haertel, E. & Rothstein, J. 2012. Teacher Evaluation. Oakland
University, Sagepublisher Vol 93, No. 6.
Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M. & Hopkins, D. 2010. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, London New York. Vol. 23.
Husain, M. Z., Hasan, A., Wahab, N. B. A., & Jantan, J. 2015. Determining Teaching Effectiveness for Physical Education Teacher. ElsevierPublisher, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 733 – 740.
Kreber, C., Brook, P. & Educational Policy. 2001. Impact Evaluation of Educational Development Programmes. International Journal forAcademic Development, 6:2, 96-108.
Liansoro, A. 2016. Kompetensi Guru Pendidikan Jasmani : Analisis dari Perspektif Manajemen. STKIP Pasundan. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan OlahragaVolume 2 Nomor 1.
Lerner, R. M., Boyd, M. J. & Du, D. 2010. Adolescent Development. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Maksum, A. 2007. Paradoks Guru Pendidikan Jasmani. FIK : Universitas Negeri Surabaya,
Journal of Physical Education and Sport Volume 1 Nomor 1.
Mizikaci, F. 2006. A Systems Approach to Program Evaluation Model for Quality in Higher Education : Program Evaluation Model. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 14 No. 1, 2006pp. 37-53 q.
Moshman, D. 2011. Adolescent Rationality and Development ; Cognition, Morality, and Identity : Third Edition. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Mosston, M. & Ashworth, S. 2008. Teaching Physical Education: First OnlineEdition. Pearson Education (www.aw.com/bc) , (Online), Diakses pada 20 Oktober 2019.
Musa, M. F. & Ahmad, Z. 2012. Higher Education Physical Assets and Facilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50 472 – 478.
Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P. & Wholey, J. S. 2015. Handbook of practicalprogram evaluation:
Fourth edition. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, Canada.
Radar, Bengkulu, 20 Oktober 2016. Guru Mukomuko Masuk Zona Merah. Radarbengkulu.co.id: Portal Berita Bengkulu Terdepan dan Terpercaya (http://www.radarbengkulu.co.id/guru-mukomuko-masukzona-merah.html).
Rocha, R. F. & Clemente, F. M. 2012. Expertise in Sport and Physical Education: Review through
Essential Factors. Journal of Physical Education andSport (JPES), 12(4), Art 82, pp. 557-559
Rowe, K. 2003. The Importance of Teacher Quality as a Key Determinant ofStudents’
Experiences and Outcomes of Schooling. Australian Council for Educational Research : ACEReSearch.
Saryono & Nopembri, S. 2013. Analisis Kebutuhan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga
Kesehatan Berbasis Integrated Physical Education Di Sekolah Dasar. Pendidikan Olahraga. FIK : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia Volume 9, Nomor 2, November 2013.
Siedentop, D. 2011. Complete guide to sport education : 2nd ed. Daryl Siedentop, Peter A. Hastie, Hans van der Mars., United States of America. Human Kinetics.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : ALFABETA.
Stavropoulou, A. & Stroubouki, T. 2014. Evaluation of Educational Programmes : The Contribution of History to Modern Evaluation Thinking. HealthScience Journal, 8 (2): 193-204.
Stufflebeam, D. L. 2002. The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Dalam D.L. Stufflebeam, G.F. Madaus and T. Kellaghan (Eds.). Evaluation Models :Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, SecondEdition (hlm. 279-317). Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L. 2007. CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist : Second Edition. Evaluation Checklists Project (www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists), (Online), diakses 10 November 2019.
Stufflebeam, D. L. & Coryn, C. L. S. 2014. Evaluation, Theory, Models, and Applications. Second Edition. Jossey-Bass: San Fransisco.
Wen-Wei Ho, Chen, Wei-Jen., Ho, ChiKung., Lee, Ming-Been., Chen, CC. & Chou, F. HC. 2011. Evaluation of the Suicide Prevention Program in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, Using the CIPP Evaluation Model. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. Community Ment Health Journal, 47:542–550.
Widodo. 2014. Strategi Peningkatan Aktivitas Jasmani Siswa Sekolah Dasar di Luar Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan diIndonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Vol. 20, No. 2.
UNESCO, 2019. Global Education Monitorin Report-Migration, Displacement and Education, Paris : Buliding Bridges.
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffth, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C. & Misulis,K. 2011. Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal ofHigher Education Outreach and Engagement, Volume 15, Number 4, p. 57.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pendidikan Kesehatan Rekreasi is published under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY NC SA 4.0. This license permits others to copy, distribute, modify, and create derivative works for non-commercial purposes only
