Keefektifan Pendekatan Asesmen Kinerja dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Blahbatuh

Authors

  • Ni Wayan Sunita Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FPMIPA IKIP PGRI Bali
  • I Wayan Eka Mahendra Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FPMIPA IKIP PGRI Bali
  • Ni Wayan Darmayani Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FPMIPA IKIP PGRI Bali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2548098

Keywords:

performance assessment, think creatively, the result

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know the effect of performance assessment approach and the the ability to think creatively to the study result of mathematics student class VIII at SMP Negeri 1 Blahbatuh, and to know which assesssment approach is better used in obtaining better result of mathematics. In the implementation, in the experimental group is given treatment in the form of performance assessment and control group is given treatment in the form of conventional assessment. This research is categorized quasi experiment with the design of Treatment by Level.The population in this research is all the students of class VIII at SMP Negeri 1 Blahbatuh which consist of 346 people.The study sample involved as many as 78 people in the experimental class and 77 people in the control class. Samples were taken randomly with multistage random sampling technique. The instrument used in this research is the test for result of mathematic and the ability to think creatively. In this research data analysis using analysis of variance test (ANAVA) Two Path and further test that is Tukey test. The result of this study show there is the differences result of mathematics between students who were assessed using performance assessment with students assessed using conventional assessment. Further interaction between the assessment form and the level of the ability to think creatively toward the the result of mathematic. For learners who have high creative thinking ability more suitable given the performance assessment, while learners who have low creative thinking ability more suitable given conventional assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, Zainal. 2014. Penelitian Pendidikan Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2008. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Candiasa, I Made. 2010. Statistik Univariat dan Bivariat Disertai Aplikasi SPSS. Singaraja: Undiksha Press.

Febriyanti, Ulfa Amalia, dkk. 2016. Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas VII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Open-Ended Pada Sub Pokok Bahasan Persegi Panjang dan Persegi.Jurnal Edukasi UNEJ

Firdaus, dkk. 2016. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA Melalui Pembelajaran Open Ended Pada Materi SPLDV. Jurnal
Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Vol. 1, No. 2, Februari 2016.

Fitriyah, Lailatul dkk.-. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Gunawan, Muhammad Ali. 2015. Statistik Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Sosial. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Hamzah, Ali dan Muhlisrarini. 2014. Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Hodiyanto. 2014. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Gender Pada Materi
Himpunan. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains Vol. 3, No. 1, Juni 2014.

Ismaimuzaa, Dasa. 2013. Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Strategi
Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Teknologi.

Koyan. 2012. Statistika Pendidikan. Bali: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Press.

Mahendra, Eka dan Parmithi, Nyoman. 2015. Statistik Dasar dalam Penelitian Pendidikan. Surabaya: Paramita.

Mahendra. 2016. Contextual Learning Approach and Performance Assessment In Mathematics Learning. Internasional Research Journal of
Management.

Marhaeni dkk. 2017. Asesmen Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Moma, La. 2015. Pengembangan Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Untuk Siswa SMP. Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan
Matematika Vol.4, No.1, April 2015.

Nawi. 2012. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Penalaran Formal terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas
(Swasta) AL ULUM Medan. Jurnal Tabularasa PPS UNIMED Vol. 9, No.1, Juni 2012.

Purwanto. 2008. Kreativitas Berpikir Menurut Guilford. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, No. 074 Tahun ke-14, September 2008.

Purwanto. 2014. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Septiani dan Rustaman. 2017. Implementation of Performance Assessment in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) Education to Detect Science Process Skill. Journal of Physics.

Siswono. 2004. Model Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Matematika Untuk Tingkat Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Makalah Penelitian Guru SD, SMP, SMA, dan
SMK Pemetintah Kota Surabaya Lembaga Pengabdian Masyarakat Unesa, 8-11 Desember 2004.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2017. Statistik untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujarwanto dan Ani Rusilowati. 2015. Pengembangan Instrumen Performance Assessment Berpendekatan Scientific Pada Tema Kalor dan Perpindahannya. Unnes Science Education Journal.

Suryanto, Adi dkk. 2016. Evaluasi Pembelajaran di SD. Tanggerang: Universitas Terbuka.

Suryanti, dkk. 2014. Pengaruh Asesmen Kinerja dalam Model Pembelajaran ARIAS Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Published

2018-09-03